Manhattan_Project_16x20Instead of acknowledging the true depth of our differences, the implicit assumption (from the start of the document until its final paragraph) is that Roman Catholics, Eastern Orthodox, Protestant Evangelicals and others all share a common faith in and a common commitment to the gospel’s essential claims. The document repeatedly employs expressions like “we [and] our fellow believers”; “As Christians, we . . .”; and “we claim the heritage of . . . Christians.” That seriously muddles the lines of demarcation between authentic biblical Christianity and various apostate traditions.  By Dr. John MacArthur.  Links for audio sermons at bottom of page.

“making the word of God of no effect through your tradition which you have handed down. And many such things you do.”  Mark 7:13

What is The Manhattan Declaration?

By John MacArthur

Here are the main reasons I am not signing the Manhattan Declaration, even though a few men whom I love and respect have already affixed their names to it:

• Although I obviously agree with the document’s opposition to same-sex marriage, abortion, and other key moral problems threatening our culture, the document falls far short of identifying the one true and ultimate remedy for all of humanity’s moral ills: the gospel. The gospel is barely mentioned in the Declaration. At one point the statement rightly acknowledges, “It is our duty to proclaim the Gospel of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ in its fullness, both in season and out of season”—and then adds an encouraging wish: “May God help us not to fail in that duty.” Yet the gospel itself is nowhere presented (much less explained) in the document or any of the accompanying literature. Indeed, that would be a practical impossibility because of the contradictory views held by the broad range of signatories regarding what the gospel teaches and what it means to be a Christian.

How Ecumenical Movements Move The Church to Apostasy

• This is precisely where the document fails most egregiously. It assumes from the start that all signatories are fellow Christians whose only differences have to do with the fact that they represent distinct “communities.” Points of disagreement are tacitly acknowledged but are described as “historic lines of ecclesial differences” rather than fundamental conflicts of doctrine and conviction with regard to the gospel and the question of which teachings are essential to authentic Christianity.

• Instead of acknowledging the true depth of our differences, the implicit assumption (from the start of the document until its final paragraph) is that Roman Catholics, Eastern Orthodox, Protestant Evangelicals and others all share a common faith in and a common commitment to the gospel’s essential claims. The document repeatedly employs expressions like “we [and] our fellow believers”; “As Christians, we . . .”; and “we claim the heritage of . . . Christians.” That seriously muddles the lines of demarcation between authentic biblical Christianity and various apostate traditions.

• The Declaration therefore constitutes a formal avowal of brotherhood between Evangelical signatories and purveyors of different gospels. That is the stated intention of some of the key signatories, and it’s hard to see how secular readers could possibly view it in any other light. Thus for the sake of issuing a manifesto decrying certain moral and political issues, the Declaration obscures both the importance of the gospel and the very substance of the gospel message.

• This is neither a novel approach nor a strategic stand for evangelicals to take. It ought to be clear to all that the agenda behind the recent flurry of proclamations and moral pronouncements we’ve seen promoting ecumenical co-belligerence is the viewpoint Charles Colson has been championing for more than two decades. (It is not without significance that his name is nearly always at the head of the list of drafters when these statements are issued.) He explained his agenda in his 1994 book The Body, in which he argued that the only truly essential doctrines of authentic Christian truth are those spelled out in the Apostles’ and Nicene creeds. I responded to that argument at length in Reckless Faith. I stand by what I wrote then.

In short, support for The Manhattan Declaration would not only contradict the stance I have taken since long before the original “Evangelicals and Catholics Together” document was issued; it would also tacitly relegate the very essence of gospel truth to the level of a secondary issue. That is the wrong way—perhaps the very worst way—for evangelicals to address the moral and political crises of our time. Anything that silences, sidelines, or relegates the gospel to secondary status is antithetical to the principles we affirm when we call ourselves evangelicals.

A word from Amos37:  Some scriptures to consider when thinking about this topic of Ecumenical Overtures.  It is clear to the informed that Rome is trying to gather all to herself under the Pope.  Can we as Bible-believing Christians?  It’s the same old question, Bible or Tradition.  Jesus spoke about tradition!  I’ll stick with the bible.

“making the word of God of no effect through your tradition which you have handed down. And many such things you do.”  Mark 7:13

Liberal Christianity is found in almost every denomination in the United States and, although it may seem very Christian, usually liberal Christians reject several essential biblical truths such as the inspiration and authority of the Bible (2 Timothy 3:16), Jesus as the only Savior of the entire world (John 14:6, 1 Timothy 2:5), and salvation as God’s free gift to those who believe apart from good works (Romans 3:24, 28; Galatians 2:16; Ephesians 2:8-9).


Connect with Amos37

Were on – YouTube

iTunes – Podcasts 

Were on Facebook

Were on / Pinterest

Come n See More

The Gospel According to Dominionism Dominionism shares some of the same ideologies as the emerging church, the primary similarity being the belief that a utopian “kingdom of God” will be...
Christ at the Checkpoint: The Replacements Christ at the Checkpoint is growing. will be hosted by Bethlehem Bible College. Raed Salah supporters  Stephen Sizer and Ben White are due to speak th...
Are Catholics Christian? Is Catholicism a valid expression of Christianity? Is there such a thing as an "Evangelical Catholic", or is that expression an oxymoron? Should Evang...
Emergent Church Exposed Part 2 In The Emerging Church - Part 2: Road to Rome, Roger Oakland presents documentation to show that many worshippers are being drawn into the Roman Catho...
Spiritual Deception of The Progressives There was a time when ideas like yoga or eastern meditation in the church were only associated with Christ Science churches, Universalist Churches, an...
Pope’s Push For One World One of the greatest dangers to Christianity today is the deliberate suppression of biblical truth for the sake of unity. The danger intensifies as we ...
Christian Mysticism and the Original Lie Christian Mysticism and the Original Lie... The Origin of Hidden Knowledge Has God said?  spoke the serpent the ole devil to Eve in Genesis 3:1-7 Al...
In The Beginning Discipleship Series Session 17 Vi... Session 17 Abel: A prototype of believers We contrast the life of believers (Abel) with that of unbelievers (Cain). Abel is a prototype of faith in...